BJosephD Brian j Dyer Junior Moderator Location: southern maine Join Date: 05/01/2009 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 381 Rally Car: 04 Rocky Mountain MTB... |
|
aj_johnson A.J. Johnson Senior Moderator Location: Pendleton OR Join Date: 01/07/2011 Age: Settling Down Posts: 1,381 Rally Car: 88 Audi 80 |
John, I agree with you on government spending being out of hand, and that these useless "wars" are an utter waste. However, preventing youths from straightening up their lives through service to the country is hardly the place to start.
Dan, once you are already in the military it is a different story. I have a couple of buddies who joined the army for this very reason. |
Dazed_Driver Banned Junior Moderator Location: John and Skyes Magic Love liar Join Date: 08/24/2007 Posts: 2,154 |
|
heymagic Banned Mega Moderator Location: La la land Join Date: 01/25/2006 Age: Fossilized Posts: 3,740 Rally Car: Not a Volvo |
I wouldn't join the service to avoid a DUI. That's kind of like deciding to wrestle a grizzly instead of an alligator. BUT looking to the service to possibly get your life straightened around, to get an education, to learn some discipline, well its a viable solution. I've seen several of our local kids go in total fuckups and a couple years later the change is amazing. Of course there are a couple who went in and just found a different place to screw off.
I'd stop and think about what is happening and what can happen (I know, not your strong suit ). Don't be making any hasty decisions. |
phlat65 Sean Medcroft Elite Moderator Location: Edmonds, Washington Join Date: 02/12/2009 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,802 Rally Car: Building a Merkur |
Well Tim, if you took the money from the top 20 companys and divided it by the median income of a US adult resident, it would supply 3,225,806 people with an annual salary. Thats roughly 1% of the us population.
If you took the money from the top 10, and divided it equally amongst all 307,000,000 Americans, we would each get $230. |
Dazed_Driver Banned Junior Moderator Location: John and Skyes Magic Love liar Join Date: 08/24/2007 Posts: 2,154 |
I'm not sure I follow. What are you getting at? (not trying to be an ass, I'm confused by your post) All I'm saying is that if the government is paying those companies to make missiles/planes/rockets/etc, someone has to be in there churning them out. They may have crazy profits, but they're also providing jobs (the people churning them out). So, if you took away the contracts, there is no longer need for those employees. |
fliz Chad Eixenberger Senior Moderator Location: Grafton, WI Join Date: 02/01/2007 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 484 Rally Car: 1988 VW Golf #687 |
Yes, but if the money isn't spent building death, it could be used to cure puppies with cancer, then all your death architects would instead have jobs building rainbows. |
aj_johnson A.J. Johnson Senior Moderator Location: Pendleton OR Join Date: 01/07/2011 Age: Settling Down Posts: 1,381 Rally Car: 88 Audi 80 |
|
SteveL Steve Leitch Mod Moderator Location: Ocean Shores, Washington Join Date: 01/25/2009 Posts: 280 Rally Car: Can't decide which to use... |
Probably aircraft engines... SteveL This is the point in the killing spree when you really should turn the gun on yourself |
MConte05 Matthew Conte Ultra Moderator Location: St. Louis, MO Join Date: 06/27/2011 Age: Settling Down Posts: 257 Rally Car: 1991 Subaru Legacy Turbozzzzzz |
Like he said, aircraft engines. That is their bread and butter. I am on that list of employees who would be affected by removing defense spending. I'd be out of a jerb! |
Dazed_Driver Banned Junior Moderator Location: John and Skyes Magic Love liar Join Date: 08/24/2007 Posts: 2,154 |
That is the core of my point. The money COULD be used elsewhere, but as long as its funding jobs, its doing ok. |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Infallible Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
Timmy from an macro economics point of view all spending is exactly equal.. From a moral, and justice, and longer term wellbeing point of view all spending is not equal.. You will be plaguing the earth with empty-headed platitudes for another 6+ decades, so it might be nice if the whole world doesn't descend into further chaos and violence just because a pile of US corporstions want to make billions in profits and for the moment anyway, haven't figured out a way to outsource all the activities here.. gawd, is there ever a reflective thought in that skull? John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |
Dazed_Driver Banned Junior Moderator Location: John and Skyes Magic Love liar Join Date: 08/24/2007 Posts: 2,154 |
*Sigh*
John, you're missing my point. I'm not saying they should keep building weapons, just that building weapons isn't the WORST thing BECAUSE it's providing jobs. I'd rather see the contracts reduced and the new found money go to teacher salaries. Maybe then we would get more teachers. (although, it will take more than more teachers with better pay to fix our education system) [insert quip about how good it did me ] |
aj_johnson A.J. Johnson Senior Moderator Location: Pendleton OR Join Date: 01/07/2011 Age: Settling Down Posts: 1,381 Rally Car: 88 Audi 80 |
Tim
There are quite a few holes in your thought process there. One of which is the "demand" part of supply and demand can't be some made up "demand" by a ruling body in an effort to create jobs. In reality this is the same thing as saying the military needs stuffed animals... How long can a nation afford to "create" jobs by making stuffed animals for the military. It doesn't work like that. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/20/2011 04:07PM by aj_johnson. |
HiTempguy Banned Mod Moderator Location: Red Deer, Alberta Join Date: 09/13/2011 Posts: 717 Rally Car: 2002 Subaru WRX STi |
Pay has nothing to do with it. The number 1 education improvement is better teachers, which is affected by pay nil. No different than business people or anything else, its not the pay which makes someone great. Does it increase the likelihood of better quality candidates wanting the job to begin with? Sure. But the whole attitude towards teaching needs to be changed in general. This PSA brought to you by someone who reads The Economist too much And what happened to bashing the OP? I've saw John get madder about sillier things on SS... |